Table: 3.1
Ease of Doing Business in
India (2008)
|
Starting a business
(rank) |
111 |
Closing a business (rank) |
137 |
|
Procedures (number) |
13 |
Time(days) |
10 |
|
Time (days) |
33 |
Cost (% of estate) |
9 |
|
Cost (% of income per
capita) |
74.6 |
Recovery rate (cents on
the dollar) |
11.6 |
|
Minimum capital (% of
income per capita) |
0 |
Employing Workers (rank) |
85 |
|
Enforcing contracts
(rank) |
177 |
Difficulty of hiring
index (0-100) |
0 |
|
Procedures (number) |
45 |
Rigidity of hours index
(0-100) |
20 |
|
Time (days) |
1,420 |
Difficulty of firing
index (0-100) |
70 |
|
Cost (% of claim) |
39.6 |
Rigidity of employment
index (0-100) |
30 |
|
Getting Credit (rank) |
36 |
Norwage labor cost (% of
salary) |
17 |
|
Strength of legal rights
index (0-10) |
6 |
Firing cost (weeks of
salary) |
56 |
|
Depth of credit
information index (0-6) |
4 |
|
|
|
Public registry coverage
(% of adults) |
0 |
|
|
|
Private bureau coverage
(% of adults) |
10.8 |
|
|
Source: Doing Business 2008,
World Bank
Figure 2
Top Reformers in 2006/07 By
Indicator Set
|
Starting a business |
Saudi Arabia |
|
Dealing with licenses |
Georgia |
|
Employing workers |
Czech Republic |
|
Registering property |
Ghana |
|
Getting credit |
Croatia |
|
Protecting Investors |
Georgia |
|
Paying taxes |
Bulgaria |
|
Trading across borders |
India |
|
Enforcing contracts |
Tonga |
|
Closing a business |
China |
Source: Doing Business
Database
‘Doing Business’
Report of 2008 shows a lot of improvement over the
earlier years in terms of doing business in India.
Table 3.1 below shows different parameters of
Doing Business in 2008.
Between April 2006
and June 2007, two hundred reforms in 98 economies
were introduced. Reformers simplified business
regulations, strengthened property rights, eased
tax burdens, increased access to credit and
reduced the cost of exporting and importing. Top
reformers by Indicator set in 2006-07 reveal that
India is in top reformers as far as trading across
the borders is concerned.
India has undertaken
various reforms in the field of trading across
border in recent years which is reflected in
figure 2. Table 3.2 gives a detailed description
of the components of trading across borders like
documentation, time taken, costs involved, etc.
India’s rank in trading across borders is 79.
There is still scope for improvement.
Among the various
States of India, there are wide variations in
completing the procedural formalities. The time to
obtain a business license in India ranges from 159
days in Bhubaneshwar to 522 in Ranchi. The time to
register property, from 35 days in Hyderabad to
155 in Calcutta. A hypothetical Indian city with
the country’s top performance in each of the
‘Doing Business’ indicators would rank 55
places higher on the ease of doing business than
Mumbai. The government is taking appropriate
action.
Table: 3.2
Trading Across Borders
(India)
|
Trading across borders
(rank) |
79 |
|
Documents to export
(number) |
8 |
|
Time to export (days) |
18 |
|
Cost to export (US$ per
container) |
820 |
|
Documents to import
(number) |
9 |
|
Time to import (days) |
21 |
|
Cost to import (US$ per
container) |
910 |
Source: Doing Business 2008,
World Bank
Allowing creditors
to enforce collateral by a court is one of the
toughest reforms, opposed by both borrowers and
the judiciary. But the benefits can be great.
Borrowers benefit the most. When creditors know
they can enforce their collateral if a borrower
defaults, they are more likely to lend in the
first place.
Summary proceedings
are an important backstop to enforcement through
courts when debtors appeal in such cases. Only two
pieces of evidence need to be presented to a court
in a summary proceeding: a valid security
agreement and proof of default. When India
introduced summary proceedings in 2004, the time
to enforce collateral fell from more than 9 years
to as little as 6 months (Figure 3 & 4).
(‘Doing Business’ 2008).
The credit bureau
has been expanded to include payment histories on
businesses as well as individuals. An electronic
collateral registry for security rights granted by
companies was also introduced.
Figure
3
Easier
to recover collateral in India
Source: Doing Business Database
Figure
4
More
Credit Information – The most popular reform in
2006/07
Source:
Doing Business Database
Since 2001, the World Economic
Forum has been using the Growth Competitiveness
Index (Growth CI) developed by Jeffrey Sachs and
John McArthur to assess the competitiveness of
nations. The GCI provides a holistic overview of
factors that are critical to driving productivity
& competitiveness and groups them into twelve
pillars:
-
Institutions
-
Infrastructure
-
Macro economy
-
Health and primary
education
-
Higher education and
training
-
Market efficiency
-
Labour Market Efficiency
-
Finance Market
Sophistication
-
Technological readiness
-
Market size
-
Business sophistication
-
Innovation
Although all the twelve pillars
matter to a certain extent for all countries, the
importance of each one depends on a country’s
particular stage of development. To take this into
account, the pillars are organized into three sub
indexes, each critical to a particular stage of
development.
India is included in the
category of factor driven stage which is GCI’s
first stage of development. To maintain
competitiveness at this stage of development, we
need a stable macroeconomic framework (pillar 1),
well-functioning public and private institutions
(pillar 2), appropriate infrastructure (pillar 3),
and a healthy, literate workforce (pillar 4).
India, at 50th place, derives
substantial advantages not only from its market
size (ranked 4th for its domestic market size and
5th for its foreign market size) but also from its
strong business sophistication (ranked 27th) and
innovation (ranked 32nd).The country is endowed
with strong business clusters and many local
suppliers, and ranks an impressive 3rd for the
availability of scientists and engineers and 27th
for the quality of its research institutions. (The
Global Competitiveness Report 2008-09, World
Economic Forum)
Status of Infrastructure in
India is indicated in Figure 5. The figure shows
the index of India in terms of seven indicators
like Infrastructure, Shipment (International),
Logistics competence, tracking and tracing,
Domestic logistics cost, Timeliness and Customs on
the scale of 0 to 5. The figure is derived from
the Logistic Performance Index (LPI) estimated by
the World Bank. Singapore stands top in this index
and Afghanistan is at the bottom (out of 150
countries). The international ranking along with
categorization of all 150 countries can be seen at
Annexure 3.1.
The above figure clearly
indicates that on an average India stands midway
between 0 to 5 scales. This also indicates that
India is above the world average. Singapore is
much ahead of India except in domestic logistic
cost.
We are lagging behind the world
except in domestic logistic costs as can be seen
from the following table.
Figure
5
Logistics
Performance of India
Source: www.worldbank.org/lpi
Table: 3.3
Top Five Performers vs. India
|
Country |
LPI |
Customs |
Infra
-
structure |
Internationa
l shipments |
Logistics
competence |
Tracking
&
tracing |
Domestic
logistics
costs |
Time
-
liness |
|
Singapore |
4.19 |
3.9 |
4.27 |
4.04 |
4.21 |
4.25 |
2.7 |
4.53 |
|
Netherlands |
4.18 |
3.99 |
4.29 |
4.05 |
4.25 |
4.14 |
2.65 |
4.38 |
|
Germany |
4.1 |
3.88 |
4.19 |
3.91 |
4.21 |
4.12 |
2.34 |
4.33 |
|
Sweden |
4.08 |
3.85 |
4.11 |
3.9 |
4.06 |
4.15 |
2.44 |
4.43 |
|
Austria |
4.06 |
3.83 |
4.06 |
3.97 |
4.13 |
3.97 |
2.24 |
4.44 |
|
India |
3.07 |
2.69 |
2.9 |
3.08 |
3.27 |
3.03 |
3.08 |
3.47 |
Source: www.worldbank.org/lpi
Initiatives
by Department of Commerce
The basic role of the
Department of Commerce is to facilitate the creation of
an enabling environment and infrastructure for
accelerated growth of exports and international trade.
In the area of improving infrastructure facilities, the
main thrust of the Department is to coordinate with the
other Departments and agencies for initiating required
policies to improve infrastructure and remove the
bottlenecks. In order to resolve the bottlenecks faced
by exporters/importers on infrastructural front,
Department of Commerce is taking up the matter on
regular basis with the administrative Department
concerned like Shipping, Road Transport & Highways,
Revenue, Civil Aviation, Railways, etc. Besides
coordination with the Ministries concerned, the
Department is also implementing a number of programmes/schemes
aiming directly at improving the existing infrastructure
and creation of new facilities. The major programmes in
this category are (i) Assistance to States for
Developing Export Infrastructure and other Allied
Activities (ASIDE) and (ii) Special Economic Zones (SEZs).
Some of the important initiatives of the Department of
Commerce in this regard are -
A Core Group of
Secretaries under the Chairmanship of Cabinet Secretary
has been constituted to deal with the issues relating to
infrastructure required for exports and imports. The
Core Group shall also recommend measures for removal of
critical bottlenecks in infrastructure hampering
development of exports and imports and review of
functioning of service providers at ports / airports /
LCSs, etc. with a view to identifying procedures /
systems that inhibit trade and take measures to remove
them. The first meeting of the Core Group was held on
17.11.2008 under the Chairmanship of Cabinet Secretary.
-
Two
high level committees, viz. the Standing Committee
on Promotion of Exports by Sea (SCOPE-SHIPPING) and
the Standing Committee on Promotion of Exports by
Air (SCOPE-AIR) are functioning under the
chairmanship of the Additional Secretary
(Infrastructure), Department of Commerce. The
objective of these committees is to address
constraints in the smooth movement of international
cargo and resolve problems of exporters concerning
Customs, Containerisation, Air, Shipping &
Railways related issues.
-
Single
Window clearance for the proposals for setting up of
Inland Container Depots/Container Freight Stations/
Air Cargo Complexes (ICDs/CFSs/ACCs) is being given
through an Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC)
functioning in the Deptt. since 1992 under the
Chairmanship of Additional Secretary (Infrastructure
Division), Department of Commerce. During the last
four years (January 2004- August 2008) 16 meetings
of Inter-Ministerial Committee were held and 101
Letter of Intent (LOI) were issued for setting up
ICDs/CFSs/ACCs. During 2007-08, 25 LOI were issued
for setting up of ICDs/CFSs.
-
Since
2002, the Department is implementing Assistance to
States for Developing Export Infrastructure and
other Allied Activities (ASIDE) for filling in the
critical gaps in the export related infrastructure
by providing necessary funds to States as well as
Central agencies. During the Eleventh Five Year
Plan, an outlay of Rs.3664 crore has been approved
for the Scheme. As against this, total funds
released during the Plan period (till date) amount
to Rs 1159 crore. An outlay of Rs 570 crore has been
approved for the year 2008-09. Details of the Scheme
are in Chapter 5.
-
Land
Customs Stations are gateways for transit of goods,
services and human beings between neighbouring
countries. Department of Commerce has earmarked an
allocation of Rs.20.00 crore under ASIDE Scheme per
year for three years for the development of
prioritized Land Customs Stations in the North-East
Region.
-
The
Department oversees the programme of Special
Economic Zones as a major initiative of the
Government to attract a large flow of foreign and
domestic investment in infrastructure and productive
capacity leading to generation of additional
economic activity and creation of employment
opportunities. As on 31.3.2009, 564 formal approvals
have been granted for setting up of Special Economic
Zones, out of which 291 SEZs have been notified and
are in various stages of operation. Special Economic
Zones notified under SEZ Act, 2005 have already made
an investment of Rs. 98498 crore in the very short
span of time since the coming into force of SEZ Act
in February, 2006. SEZs in India provide direct
employment to 3.78 lakh persons. The details may be
seen in Chapter 6.
EDI
Initiatives in DGFT
Considerable progress has
been made by Directorate General of Foreign Trade in
making its functioning e-compatible. Importer Exporter
Code Number (IEC), which is a pre-requisite for carrying
on import/export business under the FTDR Act, is
communicated online by DGFT to Customs. Current
automation levels permit web based electronic filing of
applications at DGFT website www.dgft.gov.in for
grant of incentives under the Foreign Trade Policy.
Present DGFT e-filing architecture also has the facility
for accepting digital signatures and electronic fund
transfer. 50% concession in applicable application fee
is granted on e-filing of applications.
Message exchange for
Export/Import authorisations issued under Duty Exemption
Scheme (DES), Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme (DEPB)
and Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG) is
fully operational with Customs. This, in turn,
facilitates faster online import and export clearances
at designated EDI ports.
Annexure
3.1
International Logistic Performance
Index and Rank
|
Rank |
Countrya |
LPI |
Rank |
Countryb |
LPI |
Rank |
Countryc |
LPI |
Rank |
Countryd |
LPI |
|
1 |
Singapore |
4.19 |
38 |
Czech Republic |
3.13 |
75 |
Guatemala |
2.53 |
113 |
Burundi |
2.29 |
|
2 |
Netherlands |
4.18 |
39 |
India |
3.07 |
76 |
Kenya |
2.52 |
114 |
Zimbabwe |
2.29 |
|
3 |
Germany |
4.1 |
40 |
Poland |
3.04 |
77 |
Gambia, The |
2.52 |
115 |
Serbia and Montenegro |
2.28 |
|
4 |
Sweden |
4.08 |
41 |
Saudi Arabia |
3.02 |
78 |
Iran, Islamic Rep. |
2.51 |
116 |
Guinea-Bissau |
2.28 |
|
5 |
Austria |
4.06 |
42 |
Latvia |
3.02 |
79 |
Uruguay |
2.51 |
117 |
Lao PDR |
2.25 |
|
6 |
Japan |
4.02 |
43 |
Indonesia |
3.01 |
80 |
Honduras |
2.5 |
118 |
Jamaica |
2.25 |
|
7 |
Switzerland |
4.02 |
44 |
Kuwait |
2.99 |
81 |
Cambodia |
2.5 |
119 |
Togo |
2.25 |
|
8 |
Hong Kong, China |
4 |
45 |
Argentina |
2.98 |
82 |
Colombia |
2.5 |
120 |
Madagascar |
2.24 |
|
9 |
United Kingdom |
3.99 |
46 |
Qatar |
2.98 |
83 |
Uganda |
2.49 |
121 |
Burkina Faso |
2.24 |
|
10 |
Canada |
3.92 |
47 |
Estonia |
2.95 |
84 |
Cameroon |
2.49 |
122 |
Nicaragua |
2.21 |
|
11 |
Ireland |
3.91 |
48 |
Oman |
2.92 |
85 |
Comoros |
2.48 |
123 |
Haiti |
2.21 |
|
12 |
Belgium |
3.89 |
49 |
Cyprus |
2.92 |
86 |
Angola |
2.48 |
124 |
Eritrea |
2.19 |
|
13 |
Denmark |
3.86 |
50 |
Slovak Republic |
2.92 |
87 |
Bangladesh |
2.47 |
125 |
Ghana |
2.16 |
|
14 |
United States |
3.84 |
51 |
Romania |
2.91 |
88 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
2.46 |
126 |
Namibia |
2.16 |
|
15 |
Finland |
3.82 |
52 |
Jordan |
2.89 |
89 |
Benin |
2.45 |
127 |
Somalia |
2.16 |
|
16 |
Norway |
3.81 |
53 |
Vietnam |
2.89 |
90 |
Macedonia, FYR |
2.43 |
128 |
Bhutan |
2.16 |
|
17 |
Australia |
3.79 |
54 |
Panama |
2.89 |
91 |
Malawi |
2.42 |
129 |
Uzbekistan |
2.16 |
|
18 |
France |
3.76 |
55 |
Bulgaria |
2.87 |
92 |
Sri Lanka |
2.4 |
130 |
Nepal |
2.14 |
|
19 |
New Zealand |
3.75 |
56 |
Mexico |
2.87 |
93 |
Nigeria |
2.4 |
131 |
Armenia |
2.14 |
|
20 |
United Arab Emirates |
3.73 |
57 |
Sao Tome and Principe |
2.86 |
94 |
Morocco |
2.38 |
132 |
Mauritius |
2.13 |
|
21 |
Taiwan, China |
3.64 |
58 |
Lithuania |
2.78 |
95 |
Papua New Guinea |
2.38 |
133 |
Kazakhstan |
2.12 |
|
22 |
Italy |
3.58 |
59 |
Peru |
2.77 |
96 |
Dominican Republic |
2.38 |
134 |
Gabon |
2.1 |
|
23 |
Luxembourg |
3.54 |
60 |
Tunisia |
2.76 |
97 |
Egypt, Arab Rep. |
2.37 |
135 |
Syrian Arab Republic |
2.09 |
|
24 |
South Africa |
3.53 |
61 |
Brazil |
2.75 |
98 |
Lebanon |
2.37 |
136 |
Mongolia |
2.08 |
|
25 |
Korea, Rep. |
3.52 |
62 |
Guinea |
2.71 |
99 |
Russian Federation |
2.37 |
137 |
Tanzania |
2.08 |
|
26 |
Spain |
3.52 |
63 |
Croatia |
2.71 |
100 |
Zambia |
2.37 |
138 |
Solomon Islands |
2.08 |
|
27 |
Malaysia |
3.48 |
64 |
Sudan |
2.71 |
101 |
Senegal |
2.37 |
139 |
Albania |
2.08 |
|
28 |
Portugal |
3.38 |
65 |
Philippines |
2.69 |
102 |
Cote d’Ivoire |
2.36 |
140 |
Algeria |
2.06 |
|
29 |
Greece |
3.36 |
66 |
El Salvador |
2.66 |
103 |
Kyrgyz Republic |
2.35 |
141 |
Guyana |
2.05 |
|
30 |
China |
3.32 |
67 |
Mauritania |
2.63 |
104 |
Ethiopia |
2.33 |
142 |
Chad |
1.98 |
|
31 |
Thailand |
3.31 |
68 |
Pakistan |
2.62 |
105 |
Liberia |
2.31 |
143 |
Niger |
1.97 |
|
32 |
Chile |
3.25 |
69 |
Venezuela, RB |
2.62 |
106 |
Moldova |
2.31 |
144 |
Sierra Leone |
1.95 |
|
33 |
Israel |
3.21 |
70 |
Ecuador |
2.6 |
107 |
Bolivia |
2.31 |
145 |
Djibouti |
1.94 |
|
34 |
Turkey |
3.15 |
71 |
Paraguay |
2.57 |
108 |
Lesotho |
2.3 |
146 |
Tajikistan |
1.93 |
|
35 |
Hungary |
3.15 |
72 |
Costa Rica |
2.55 |
109 |
Mali |
2.29 |
147 |
Myanmar |
1.86 |
|
36 |
Bahrain |
3.15 |
73 |
Ukraine |
2.55 |
110 |
Mozambique |
2.29 |
148 |
Rwanda |
1.77 |
|
37 |
Slovenia |
3.14 |
74 |
Belarus |
2.53 |
111 |
Azerbaijan |
2.29 |
149 |
Timor-Leste |
1.71 |
| |
|
112 |
Yemen, Rep. |
2.29 |
150 |
Afghanistan |
1.21 |